Hey everyone,
Quick one just to let everyone know that more Gold Coast Champions Cup 2012 photos are going online overnight to the Flickr account for your viewing pleasure. I had hoped it would be updated by now, but crashed sometime during my evening out. Funny how even though I'm not coordinating anything, I'm still updating the blog late into the evening.....
Been too tired to do much blog updating, even with only a few games per day due to high referee numbers involved. I have been doing some coaching with local GC junior referees between games, so this takes some energy as well I guess.
Always interesting to see who turns up for this type of event and how far they have travelled. Several Brisbane juniors / seniors, Cairns junior, South Australia senior and NZ of course is represented.
The quality of local refs is good to excellent given their resources and looks like their new structures have helped from what I observed in 2010. Some new first years still making those first year mistakes, but overall the tournament must be happy with the service being provided. Happy bunch too, with lots of humour and loud music playing in the early morning roll call to get everyone syched up. Had my first ride on a golf cart yesterday, almost as dangerous as refereeing a U/12 centre.
Match officials golf carts are however a geninue OH&S issue around the grounds and I'm surprised that no one has been run down yet as they wizz between, across and around grounds, usually during live matches. I even saw one drive directly onto the FOP tonight during an all in melee on U/18. I wasn't sure what he thought he would be able to do, drive over the offenders wrestling on the ground? Way to much power, way too little direction as to their roles.
After some dinner I headed back to Field 2 to watch the end of the 18's match and support the New Zealand crew on the U/21's. Unfortunately I was able to witness at close range a completely out of hand losing player in the 18's make some poor choices post game in confronting the Assistant Referee, expressing his view in some colourful language and then feeling the need to push the AR in the chest before being dragged away.
I won't say too much as I'd hope the organisation running the tournament will deal with him appropriately and pass onto the relevant authorities any necessary reports to ensure this young man learns that this conduct is totally unacceptable in Football.
U/21's was a fairly tame affair in contract, with Mark and the crew managing the game well, including a penalty within 20 seconds of kickoff, perhaps a record for this years tournament.
Left before the end to watch the opening matches of the Croatian Football Tournament, being hosted just down the road at the GC Knights ground. Big turn out for the opening night, beer tent, rides and lots of buzz amongst a crowd easily several hundred. GCCC coordinator Neil O'Connor strongly officiated the opening game, with AR's Geoff Talintyre (GCCC Coordinator) and Craig O'Neill (GC Football Referees Coach). Craig did game two and it looks to be a competitive tournament for the next few days, so GC referee's will need to be on it (and those outoftowners who are helping out)
Off to bed - last pics from today have completed as I speak and I have a game at 9am in Nerang. I'll have the afternoon off to relax and focus before running the U/21's Semi Final, rather unexpected appointment but a nice surprise regardless. Unsure what will happen on Saturday with finals and might be happy to just watch the juniors / take pics, but think I may have some Croatian FT games. We'll see....
Will try and update twitter / FB over the day.
Introduction
Random and unofficial insights and happenings at Football Tournaments nationally from the officials perspective
Showing posts with label Semi Finals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Semi Finals. Show all posts
Friday, September 28, 2012
Thursday, August 9, 2012
Applying the LOTG
So the Canada -v- USA Women's Olympic game was a cracker by all accounts, and not without its own level of drama surrounding application of the Laws of the Game. I didn't see the match and working off online reports, here's my take.
Referee Christina Pedersen, a Norwegian referee awarded a IDFK to USA due to the Canadian goalkeeper exceeding the six second rule.

Photo: afterellen.com
To quote the LOTG
Regardless, the referee awarded the IDFK in 78th minute and directly following a penalty decision was called for handball when the USA kicked the ball directly against a Canadian defender. The penalty was scored and extra time was then taken, USA scoring in the dying seconds, winning the match 4-3.
The media has been in a frenzy over what is actually correct by the LOTG and other media reports have indicated that even on video replay the goalkeeper held the ball for 10 seconds. Regardless it did change the course of the match and the outcome for Finals.
Here's some other reported links, all Canadian - The Star, The Globe and Mail
Following the match and comments made by the Canadians, FIFA today has indicated it'll wait until following the Bronze game to apply any sanctions - My San Antonio
It's an interesting reflection on the game in its professional -v- amateur status. The media has made much of pointing to a lack of application of this section of Law 12 in professional leagues for several years. Why is this the case, when weekly you can see goal keepers taking all the time in the world to put the ball back into play?
Does the lack of application come from elite referees being told to ignore this aspect due to its disruptive / interfering aspect in the flow of a match, with the referee attempting to not be seen / heard during the match? Or is it just a forgotten part of law?
What do you think?
Applying this at a local Div 6 level Sunday league football may draw questions from players and abuse from uninformed spectators, but everyone will accept it as a part of the game.
The keeper cannot hold the ball longer than 6 seconds - why, because FIFA wants to ensure that the game is played quickly and fairly. Doesn't anyone remember the time before this section was added to the LOTG and how much time was spent watching the keeper "hold" the ball? The game is now quicker and more engaging for spectators, those same who are quick to post negative comments online.
The IDFK is applied to address the offense and potentally ensure that the keeper doesn't reoffend.
Unfortunately for Christina, the circumstances following that correct decision went against the natural outcome of the match. This then created the entry point for the media to be critical of several incidents and create the "who's to blame" culture, in this case the referee (as normal). In my opinion, the focus is incorrect - look to the goal keeper who didn't follow the rules, not the person applying them.
Strangely, the human impact of this "sporting moment" is what makes our game great.
And if you happen to see a six second voliation this weekend, will you be as brave as Christina to apply the LOTG?
Referee Christina Pedersen, a Norwegian referee awarded a IDFK to USA due to the Canadian goalkeeper exceeding the six second rule.
Photo: afterellen.com
To quote the LOTG
"A goalkeeper is not permitted to keep control of the ball in his hands for more than six seconds. A goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball:
- while the ball is between his hands or between his hand and any surface(e.g. ground, own body)
- while holding the ball in his outstretched open hand
- while in the act of bouncing it on the ground or tossing it into the air
Restart of play - indirect free kick from the position where the offense occurred"According to online reports, the goalkeeper was verbally warned twice (depending upon which reports you read) about this infringement by the referee / or assistant referee and still choose to hold / control the ball in excess of the six seconds. Canada was 3-2 at the time of the decision, draw your own conclusions about what the goalkeeper was thinking.
Regardless, the referee awarded the IDFK in 78th minute and directly following a penalty decision was called for handball when the USA kicked the ball directly against a Canadian defender. The penalty was scored and extra time was then taken, USA scoring in the dying seconds, winning the match 4-3.
The media has been in a frenzy over what is actually correct by the LOTG and other media reports have indicated that even on video replay the goalkeeper held the ball for 10 seconds. Regardless it did change the course of the match and the outcome for Finals.
Here's some other reported links, all Canadian - The Star, The Globe and Mail
Following the match and comments made by the Canadians, FIFA today has indicated it'll wait until following the Bronze game to apply any sanctions - My San Antonio
It's an interesting reflection on the game in its professional -v- amateur status. The media has made much of pointing to a lack of application of this section of Law 12 in professional leagues for several years. Why is this the case, when weekly you can see goal keepers taking all the time in the world to put the ball back into play?
Does the lack of application come from elite referees being told to ignore this aspect due to its disruptive / interfering aspect in the flow of a match, with the referee attempting to not be seen / heard during the match? Or is it just a forgotten part of law?
What do you think?
Applying this at a local Div 6 level Sunday league football may draw questions from players and abuse from uninformed spectators, but everyone will accept it as a part of the game.
The keeper cannot hold the ball longer than 6 seconds - why, because FIFA wants to ensure that the game is played quickly and fairly. Doesn't anyone remember the time before this section was added to the LOTG and how much time was spent watching the keeper "hold" the ball? The game is now quicker and more engaging for spectators, those same who are quick to post negative comments online.
The IDFK is applied to address the offense and potentally ensure that the keeper doesn't reoffend.
Unfortunately for Christina, the circumstances following that correct decision went against the natural outcome of the match. This then created the entry point for the media to be critical of several incidents and create the "who's to blame" culture, in this case the referee (as normal). In my opinion, the focus is incorrect - look to the goal keeper who didn't follow the rules, not the person applying them.
Strangely, the human impact of this "sporting moment" is what makes our game great.
And if you happen to see a six second voliation this weekend, will you be as brave as Christina to apply the LOTG?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)